How about 3 million readers in 1 million dollars a year

Abstract: the rise of Hustle is fast enough to let all people stare: this has been established only one year of media companies has harvested 3 million monthly readers, but also to achieve a profit, such examples in a startup is rare.

"is how Jobs curse?", "Tinder: the company is how to become a world-class firms about guns?", "the world’s top Internet Co is what kind of experience?", "the Internet more than 50% of the information is false" to see the title, you think it is not from the media style and like China, but they all come from a US media the Hustle.

Hustle, the speed of the rise enough to make all the people stare: this has been established only one year of media companies has harvested 3 million monthly readers, but also to achieve a profit, such examples in a startup is rare.

newborn calves are not afraid of tiger

, the founding team of the company, has only 3 members, namely Sam, John and Kera. The top two are the founders of the company, mainly responsible for writing and related matters, while the latter is responsible for running the company’s annual conference program. Surprisingly, none of the three members had any experience in the media industry.

 

‘s two founders noticed two very serious problems:

1, the amount of junk in the life of young people is so overwhelming that people spend hours each day filtering information;

2, life is always full of boring activities. In order to solve these two problems, two young founders decided to set up a company.

they use mail to push carefully selected content to readers, who can read directly from the mailbox without having to click on an external link. Although many experts have repeatedly questioned the efficiency of e-mail, the two founders believe that email can also be an efficient tool when used properly.

 

small teams can also leveraging large users

two attentive founder will try to avoid too much dependence on the Facebook site, because once the relevant site to make adjustments to the algorithm, all their efforts will be cast to waste. Given the cost of being too expensive, they do not intend to hire famous writers by means of a large amount of financing, let alone a few unrelated founders who are unlikely to be favored by venture capitalists.

in this case, mail will become more flexible, and only two editorial teams can move base